Part of the cultural jihad of the liberal/progressive elitist rhetoric is that "enlightened" Muslims simply reject the abrogating suras (i.e., violent, Muslim/Islam supremacist suras) of the Quran and the corresponding sayings and actions of Muhammad in the Haddith/Sunnah. This rhetoric claims that the "majority" of Muslims are so "enlightened" and that they are the "Muslim world" that Obama is reaching out to and protecting.
One of the many flaws in this "reasoning" is that Muslims do not look to the U.S. government to interpret the Quran. Muhammad interpreted the Quran by his sayings and actions as recorded in the Haddith/Sunnah. In Islam, to reject the Quran and Muhammad is to declare oneself apostate and be subject to death. Another flaw is that U.S. interest and wishful thinking does not really speak for the "majority" of the world's Muslim's intentions. That is pure fantasy. Yet another flaw is that passive does not mean peaceful. Submission to Sharia is passive, but it is not necessarily peaceful. Yet under Islam, peace is defined as the world being subjected to Sharia law.
Sharia law requires all Muslims to support "lawful" (under Sharia law: sanctioned by an Imam) jihad, whether violently, passively, or financially. And, even if it were true that not all Muslims are violent, they do embrace the Allah of the Quran and Muhammad, messenger of the Quran, even if only out of fear of being declared apostate and murdered by other Muslims. The Nazi party was also a supremacists ideology. During World War II, were all professed Nazi's violent and/or culpable, or just the ones who actually carried out the aims and goals of the Nazi ideology
