Friday, March 30, 2012

U.S. Constitutional Law vs. Islamic Sharia Law

Let's write to New York law firm Kramer Levin


To:  ltapper@kramerlevin.com, cauguste@kramerlevin.com, jmaier@kramerlevin.com, jrochon@kramerlevin.com, dcho@kramerlevin.com, nsimon@kramerlevin.com, mdunn@kramerlevin.com

Dear Counsel:

It has come to the attention of many that your law firm has canceled an event featuring Robert Spencer because C.A.I.R. has threatened and/or intimidated you. Such restriction on freedom of speech and other freedoms is exactly why Robert Spencer risks his life to tell the truth about Islam enforced by Sharia law. That is why C.A.I.R., which is an unregistered foreign agent pending indictment for violation of the The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), is seeking to terrorize you out of allowing Mr. Spencer to speak. The organization is committed to political jihad and several former C.A.I.R. officials have been convicted of Islamic terror-related crimes. C.A.I.R.'s co-founder and Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have declared their Islamic supremacist agenda and their goal of implementing Sharia law in the U.S. The California chapter of C.A.I.R. acted subversively in distributing posters telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI. This is the same group that has put pressure on you to prevent Robert Spencer from speaking at your facility.

I am a U.S. citizen who cherishes free speech and the freedom of conscious which allows me the freedom to NOT be a Muslim and to NOT submit to Islamic Sharia law. I am asking you to make a choice in this situation, U.S. Constitutional law or Sharia law.

Thank you.