Let's write to Congress (www.congress.org):
Dear Representative:
Dear Representatives:
Claiming to be oppressed, because they are not the favored class as promised by Shariah law and rationalizing jihad as defensive under Shariah law (a requirement: in defense of Islam, lands already conquered for Islam, a Muslim's "honor," etc.), Muslims are expected to and refuse to follow the law of the land they are living in and demand that Shariah law be implemented, first for themselves and then for everyone in the area where they live. Historically, that has been the the way that a country starts on the way to being a Muslim country, after there are enough Muslims in an area to be a threat that is. It is a strategy traced back to the Hadith (sayings and actions of Mohammed which interprets the Qur'an).
In the U.S. our Constitution and Bill of Rights are the supreme law of the land, and all other laws cannot contradict these. All our laws flow from this foundation (Codified Judea-Christian ethics by the way, following such Judea-Christian morality as, "Thou shall not murder"). We have many religious cults in our country, some who believe in polygamy. Yet, it is still a crime for them to be married to more than one person at a time. We do not allow those cults to have their own set of laws. Neither should we allow Muslims to have Shariah law govern them while they live in this country. I hope we nip that in the bud before it has a change to grow.
An example of life under Islam is what is happening in Malawi. The Islamic argument against the ban on polygamy in Malawi is that single women will have no choice but to become prostitutes or beggars. Widows are often forced into either prostitution or begging because of Shariah law not allowing them to go to school or leave the house without a male relative, and because Muslim men can "contract" with a woman to have her as a "temporary" wife for the night. How is that even remotely compatible with U.S. law?
